Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Expert witnesses
Question
1
#85272
Using witnesses with expertise and authority is an undoubted benefit. But who decides who these 'experts' are? And who can challenge these witnesses if their evidence proves less than reliable?
Immediately related elements
How this works
-
Science and the Law »
Science and the Law
Science and the Law☜Examining the practical and ethical implications of science in the courtroom☜F1CEB7
■
Expert witnesses
Expert witnesses☜Using witnesses with expertise and authority is an undoubted benefit. But who decides who these experts are? And who can challenge these witnesses if their evidence proves less than reliable?☜FFB597
●
Can experts be wrong? »
Can experts be wrong?
Can experts be wrong?☜☜FFB597
●
How do we decide which experts to use? »
How do we decide which experts to use?
How do we decide which experts to use?☜☜FFB597
●
What constitutes sufficient evidence? »
What constitutes sufficient evidence?
What constitutes sufficient evidence?☜☜FFB597
●
What do we mean by an 'expert' in law? »
What do we mean by an 'expert' in law?
What do we mean by an 'expert' in law?☜☜FFB597
►
Evidence-based expert agreement »
Evidence-based expert agreement
Evidence-based expert agreement☜Evidence-based knowledge that is generally agreed on by a representative group of relevant experts. ☜FFFACD
◄
Admissibility of evidence »
Admissibility of evidence
Admissibility of evidence☜There are restrictions on what can and cant be used as evidence in court. But who decides? And what is the criterion for good evidence?☜FFFACD
◄
Evidence »
Evidence
Evidence☜In an attempt to be more objective we use evidence in a court of law. But how objective is this evidence? And is it reliable enough?☜FFFACD
◄
Trust »
Trust
Trust☜How much trust should we put in people telling the truth?☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Commentaires (
0
)
- Commentaires
Ajouter un commentaire
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Ajouter une citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entrée par:
Stephen McGann
NodeID:
#85272
Node type:
Issue
Date d'entrée (GMT):
12/7/2010 4:07:00 PM
Date de la dernière modification (Heure GMT):
12/8/2010 1:07:00 PM
Show other editors
Corrélations entrantes:
3
Corrélations sortantes:
1
Evaluation moyenne:
0
by
0
utilisateurs
x
Select file to upload