Mistakes epistemological argument for a metaphysical one
Japanese Room thought experiment is only supposed to make the epistemological point that a man in a room can't tell us wether the room as a whole is thinking. It's not supposed to make a metaphsical point about what can or can't have intentionality.
Richard Double, 1984.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3] »Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
▲
The Chinese Room Argument [4] »The Chinese Room Argument [4]
▲
The Systems Reply »The Systems Reply
▲
Man in room not in position to judge »Man in room not in position to judge
▲
In Double's account brains lack understanding »In Double's account brains lack understanding
■
Mistakes epistemological argument for a metaphysical one
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About