Close parallelism between debate and scientific discourse concepts
In scientific discourse, we have "problems", "claims", "agreements", "disagreements", "arguments", "rebuttals", etc. These notions are very similar to the concepts that govern debates in general (and in the IBIS-Debategraph sense in particular).
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
DebateGraph Community »DebateGraph Community
Development Ideas »Development Ideas
New features? »New features?
Importing / Exporting »Importing / Exporting
Software / formats that you would like to export to / import from? »Software / formats that you would like to export to / import from?
Use RDF for import/export »Use RDF for import/export
What ontologies / vocabularies are available for argumentation models? »What ontologies / vocabularies are available for argumentation models?
DERI's argumentation model  »DERI's argumentation model
DERI's ontologies that could be used for argumentation? »DERI's ontologies that could be used for argumentation?
The SWAN ontology has concepts about scientific discourse (neurology) »The SWAN ontology has concepts about scientific discourse (neurology)
Close parallelism between debate and scientific discourse concepts
Evidence // Argument »Evidence // Argument
Hypothesis // Position »Hypothesis // Position
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About