Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
China supports a binding agreement on negative security assurances
Opinion
1
#64318
China supports the idea of a legally binding agreement on negative security assurances, and maintains a policy of "no first use".
Immediately related elements
How this works
-
Nuclear Politics »
Nuclear Politics
Nuclear Politics☜Since the Trinity test in New Mexico in 1945, Russia, the UK, France and China have joined the US as nuclear weapon states—with India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea also thought to possess a nuclear weapons capability. Help us map the issues around civil and military nuclear proliferation.☜F1CEB7
▲
NPT Review Conference – May 2010 »
NPT Review Conference – May 2010
NPT Review Conference – May 2010☜The 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons took place at the General Assembly Hall at United Nations Headquarters 3–28 May 2010.☜FFB597
▲
NPT RevCon 2010 – Outcome Document »
NPT RevCon 2010 – Outcome Document
NPT RevCon 2010 – Outcome Document☜UN Overview: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Adopts Outcome Document at Last Moment: Though Imperfect, Complex Text Can Advance Process on All Fronts, Speakers Say...☜FFB597
▲
2. NPT RevCon 2010 – Conclusions »
2. NPT RevCon 2010 – Conclusions
2. NPT RevCon 2010 – Conclusions☜Conclusions and recommendations for follow-on actions from NPT RevCon 2010.☜FFB597
▲
Points of contention around the final draft? »
Points of contention around the final draft?
Points of contention around the final draft?☜What were the key points of contention around the conclusions and recommendations for action as NPT RevCon 2010 entered its final day?☜FFB597
▲
Negative security assurance »
Negative security assurance
Negative security assurance☜As things stand, there is no consensus on the inclusion of a negative security assurance – i.e. a pledge from the nuclear weapons states not to use nuclear weapons on states that dont possess nuclear weapons.☜59C6EF
▲
Four of the P5 oppose the inclusion of a negative security assurance »
Four of the P5 oppose the inclusion of a negative security assurance
Four of the P5 oppose the inclusion of a negative security assurance☜Four of the P5 members oppose the inclusion of a negative security assurance in the final document.☜9FDEF6
▲
Which P5 member doesn't oppose the negative security assurance? »
Which P5 member doesn't oppose the negative security assurance?
Which P5 member doesn't oppose the negative security assurance?☜☜FFB597
■
China supports a binding agreement on negative security assurances
China supports a binding agreement on negative security assurances☜China supports the idea of a legally binding agreement on negative security assurances, and maintains a policy of no first use.☜59C6EF
◄
China will not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon states »
China will not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon states
China will not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon states ☜China has vowed not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon states or nuclear-weapon-free zones. ☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Commentaires (
0
)
- Commentaires
Ajouter un commentaire
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Ajouter une citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entrée par:
David Price
NodeID:
#64318
Node type:
Position
Date d'entrée (GMT):
5/28/2010 12:22:00 PM
Date de la dernière modification (Heure GMT):
5/28/2010 12:22:00 PM
Show other editors
Corrélations entrantes:
1
Corrélations sortantes:
0
Evaluation moyenne:
0
by
0
utilisateurs
x
Select file to upload