| Nuclear power's positioning on climate change is propaganda ArgumentOpposé1 #64242
|
|
+Citations (1)
- CitationsAjouter une citationList by: CiterankMapLink[1]
En citant: Diane Perlman
Cité par: David Price 11:04 PM 27 May 2010 GMT
Citerank: (9) 64243Nuclear industry has spent $665m in US rebranding nuclear energyThe nuclear industry spent $665 million in the US on rebranding nuclear energy as clean, green, and an answer to the climate crisis, and on congressional campaigns. 1198CE71, 64245GroupthinkThe perceived importance of nuclear power is an example of groupthink.13EF597B, 64247Support for nuclear power undermines non-proliferation and disarmamentThe third pillar of nuclear energy keeps knocking down the other two pillars - nonproliferation and disarmament.13EF597B, 64256Promotion of nuclear power makes elimination of weapons impossible22FF97FF, 128344GroupthinkThe perceived importance of nuclear power is an example of groupthink.13EF597B, 128345Support for nuclear power undermines non-proliferation and disarmamentThe third pillar of nuclear energy keeps knocking down the other two pillars - nonproliferation and disarmament.13EF597B, 128391Promotion of nuclear power makes elimination of weapons impossible22FF97FF, 128476Nuclear power's positioning on climate change is propaganda13EF597B, 128654Nuclear industry has spent $665m in US rebranding nuclear energyThe nuclear industry spent $665 million in the US on rebranding nuclear energy as clean, green, and an answer to the climate crisis, and on congressional campaigns. 1198CE71 URL:
|