Political opposition is not always based on systemic reasoning
Politicians use emotionally charged words, and distort the import of what is proposed in order to score political points and get sound bites reported. They also reason from fixed ideological positions, quoting anecdotes to reinforce their case. Objective systematic thinking is to be preferred.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Nuclear Politics Â»Nuclear Politics
Nuclear treaties and key texts? Â»Nuclear treaties and key texts?
Nuclear Treaties Â»Nuclear Treaties
New START follow-on Treaty Â»New START follow-on Treaty
Will the US Senate ratify the New START Treaty? Â»Will the US Senate ratify the New START Treaty?
Republican leadership in the Senate likely to oppose the Treaty Â»Republican leadership in the Senate likely to oppose the Treaty
Republican concerns about the New START Treaty? Â»Republican concerns about the New START Treaty?
New START Treaty is a form of appeasement that weakens US security Â»New START Treaty is a form of appeasement that weakens US security
Political opposition is not always based on systemic reasoning
Republican leadership in the Senate likely to oppose the Treaty Â»Republican leadership in the Senate likely to oppose the Treaty
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About