| START follow-on Treaty does not deliver meaningful change Opinion1 #55600 The START follow-on treaty is a symbolic at best, and does not signify meaningful change. |
|
+Citations (1)
- CitationsAjouter une citationList by: CiterankMapLink[1]
En citant: Steve Chapman
Cité par: David Price 3:31 PM 5 April 2010 GMT
Citerank: (5) 56129Mostly creative accounting rather than real cuts in warheadsAlmost all of the advertised cuts will be accomplished by changing the way warheads are counted.13EF597B, 56130B-52 assumed to carry only one bomb but it's equipped to carry 20A B-52 is assumed to carry only one bomb, for example, even though it is equipped (and will be allowed) to carry 20.1198CE71, 56131 Obama is "condemning the nation to unilateral disarmament"Through the "New Start" agreement and other policies, claims former Reagan administration official Frank Gaffney Jr., Obama is "condemning the nation to unilateral disarmament."1198CE71, 56139It is impossible to win a nuclear war1198CE71, 128833It is impossible to win a nuclear war1198CE71
URL:
|
| Extrait - The reality is that the United States, after this treaty takes effect, will have 700 missiles and bombers carrying 1,550 warheads. That's enough to turn any country on Earth into smoking, radioactive rubble, and then turn the rubble into gravel. |