Details view: Does the New START Treaty entail significant warhead cuts?

Views
Add
Edit
- Edit page
- Delete page
Share
Login
- Member login
- Register now for a free account
🔎

Does the New START Treaty entail significant warhead cuts? Question1 #55588

Immediately related elementsHow this works

Nuclear Politics »Nuclear PoliticsNuclear Politics☜Since the Trinity test in New Mexico in 1945, Russia, the UK, France and China have joined the US as nuclear weapon states—with India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea also thought to possess a nuclear weapons capability. Help us map the issues around civil and military nuclear proliferation.☜F1CEB7

▲

Nuclear treaties and key texts? »Nuclear treaties and key texts?Nuclear treaties and key texts?☜What are the key documents that are shaping, and will shape, the direction of nuclear politics? Help us develop a comprehensive list here.☜FFB597

▲

Nuclear Treaties »Nuclear TreatiesNuclear Treaties☜☜FFB597

▲

New START follow-on Treaty »New START follow-on TreatyNew START follow-on Treaty☜President Obama announced an agreement with President Medvedev on a new START Treaty on 26 March 2010. The START follow-on Treaty was signed in Prague on 8 April 2010.☜FFB597

■

Does the New START Treaty entail significant warhead cuts?Does the New START Treaty entail significant warhead cuts?☜☜FFB597

●

START follow-on Treaty entails significant cuts in warheads »START follow-on Treaty entails significant cuts in warheadsSTART follow-on Treaty entails significant cuts in warheads☜Under the Treaty, the U.S. and Russia will be limited to significantly fewer strategic arms within seven years from the date the Treaty enters into force.☜59C6EF

Heading

Summary

Click the button to enter task scheduling information

Details

Enter task details

Message text

Select assignee(s)

Due date (click calendar)

RadDatePicker

Open the calendar popup.

Calendar

Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<	<	July 2024	>	<<

July 2024
	S	M	T	W	T	F	S
27	30	1	2	3	4	5	6
28	7	8	9	10	11	12	13
29	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
30	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
31	28	29	30	31	1	2	3
32	4	5	6	7	8	9	10

Reminder

Ready to post Copy to text

Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered

Lock

Comment graphing options

Choose comments:Comment onlyWhole threadAll comments

Choose location:To a new mapTo this map

New map options

Select map ontology Graph to private map

+Commentaires (0)

- CommentairesAjouter un commentaireNewest firstOldest firstShow threads

+Citations (1)

- CitationsAjouter une citationList by: CiterankMap

Link[1]

En citant: Fred Kaplan (Slate)
Cité par: François Dongier 11:28 PM 28 March 2010 GMT
URL:

http://www.slate.com/id/2248887

Extrait -

Over the years, both sides have cut their nuclear arsenals on their own initiative. The United States now has about 850 strategic delivery vehicles (very close to the new treaty's limit), and Russia has about 600 (below that limit). The U.S. has 2,252 bombs and warheads, while Russia has about 2,787—closer to, or a little above, the '91 treaty's limits. So the new treaty will force some cuts on both sides—but not as deeply as these numbers suggest.

+About

- About

Entrée par: François Dongier
NodeID: #55588
Node type: Issue
Date d'entrée (GMT): 3/28/2010 11:26:00 PM
Date de la dernière modification (Heure GMT): 3/28/2010 11:40:00 PM
Show other editors
Corrélations entrantes: 0
Corrélations sortantes: 0
Evaluation moyenne: 0 by 0 utilisateurs

x Select file to upload