This is naive and fallacious (post hoc propter hoc)
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Amanpour CNN »Amanpour CNN
Other programs? »Other programs?
Guantanamo Bay? »Guantanamo Bay?
Conduct of interrogations? »Conduct of interrogations?
Efficacy of torture? »Efficacy of torture?
It works, but let's call it "enhanced interrogation" »It works, but let's call it "enhanced interrogation"
4 terrorist attacks were averted by enhanced interrogations »4 terrorist attacks were averted by enhanced interrogations
This is naive and fallacious (post hoc propter hoc)
UK does not use torture and had no attacks in last 5 years either »UK does not use torture and had no attacks in last 5 years either
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About