( - ) ℋ Id(entity)
_209 ; oType = "Resolution" ; (Maybe positioned inconsistently)Resolved: This debate graph software is a useful Epistemology tool, in addition to being a useful tool for informed debates; the purpose for which it was developed.
wp:Epistemology

(Information in) the Details tab of this graph Is being structured as ...

  1. Content Specific points
  2. Content related explanations
  3. Planned Content expansion Tasks

Note: the Resolution idea is not yet apparent.

 


Since this "Why" type of Node appears at the top of the Search list displayed by default when "map_home" is used, it is a good place for "initial" information such as ...

  • Introductory (Lede) comments.
  • Current Priorities ( Why = Deadlines )
  • This might be a good place to enumerate EntryPoints since it appears near the top of the lists.
  • Maps that are "by invitation" should be listed here as an implicit solicitation for Community members.
  • Notes regarding DebateGraph uses are likely to support use for SR & ED, especially given the need to "bootstrap" and continuously revise the organization of Graphs for various Audiences.

 


DebateGraph uses in this context ...

  • Communication
  • Knowledge management
    • incremental learning
  • Work breakdown
  • Clarification of Issues
  • ...

Work in process (Wip) notes ...

  • "Capture first, then re-factor" is a useful methodology.
  • Use KeepH for easy scheduled access to specific Nodes
  • "Reduce scrolling" is generally a valid objective.
  • find out if I can now delete Bookmarks.

^

Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
202?-Ð( 丑 ) »202?-Ð( 丑 )
Identity »Identity
ℋ »
( - ) ℋ Id(entity)
/ = Content(?) ( X NamesH ; ⌘ = place ) ; 面 = Dimension »/ = Content(?) ( X NamesH ; ⌘ = place ) ; 面 = Dimension
`- »`-
⌱ = Origin (mathematics) »⌱ = Origin (mathematics)
Interpretationℋ  »Interpretationℋ
twitter »twitter
🔝  »🔝
Privacy »Privacy
🆔ℋ »🆔ℋ
🆔 Id(entity) »🆔 Id(entity)
who.ID »who.ID
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About