Even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is
Phil Jones to Michael Mann: "I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!”
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Anthropogenic Climate Change »Anthropogenic Climate Change
Human impact on the Earth's climate? »Human impact on the Earth's climate?
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear »Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed »IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable »IPCC process isn't wholly reliable
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process »Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy »Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy
Individuals/small groups can't exclude peer-reviewed papers from IPCC »Individuals/small groups can't exclude peer-reviewed papers from IPCC
Peer-review process has been corrupted »Peer-review process has been corrupted
Discussed keeping papers out of IPCC report »Discussed keeping papers out of IPCC report
Even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About