Philosophical behaviorism is circular
Any attempt to define mental states in terms of behaviorial dispositions relies on further mental states. But this is a circular definition of mentality.

For example, if the desire to eat chicken is defined as a disposition to eat chicken when chicken is present, then this presupposes belief that chicken is edible, which presupposes a belief that chicken is non-poisonous, and so forth.


Roderick M. Chisholm, 1957.


 

Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can the Turing Test determine this? [2]  »Can the Turing Test determine this? [2] 
▲
Yes: defines intelligence operationally/behaviorally »Yes: defines intelligence operationally/behaviorally
▲
Philosophical (or logical) behaviorism »Philosophical (or logical) behaviorism
■
Philosophical behaviorism is circular
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About