Tacit knowledge doesn't explain the results
Neuroimaging results can't be explained by appeal to tacit knowledge.
Kosslyn and Thompson (2003).
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence Â»Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] Â»Can computers think? [1]
▲
No: computers can't understand images [5b] Â»No: computers can't understand images [5b]
▲
Images represented by filled cells in an array Â»Images represented by filled cells in an array
▲
Images are Quasi-pictorial representations Â»Images are Quasi-pictorial representations
▲
Image Psychology Â»Image Psychology
▲
Experimental evidence Â»Experimental evidence
▲
Neuroimaging evidence Â»Neuroimaging evidence
■
Tacit knowledge doesn't explain the results
●
Activation of early visual cortex Â»Activation of early visual cortex
●
Participants can't influence brain areas voluntarily Â»Participants can't influence brain areas voluntarily
●
Participants not aware of relevant brain areas Â»Participants not aware of relevant brain areas
►
Argument undermined by neuroimaging evidence Â»Argument undermined by neuroimaging evidence
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About