Tacit knowledge doesn't explain the results
Neuroimaging results can't be explained by appeal to tacit knowledge.
Kosslyn and Thompson (2003).
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence Â»Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1] Â»Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't understand images [5b] Â»No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Images represented by filled cells in an array Â»Images represented by filled cells in an array
Images are Quasi-pictorial representations Â»Images are Quasi-pictorial representations
Image Psychology Â»Image Psychology
Experimental evidence Â»Experimental evidence
Neuroimaging evidence Â»Neuroimaging evidence
Tacit knowledge doesn't explain the results
Activation of early visual cortex Â»Activation of early visual cortex
Participants can't influence brain areas voluntarily Â»Participants can't influence brain areas voluntarily
Participants not aware of relevant brain areas Â»Participants not aware of relevant brain areas
Argument undermined by neuroimaging evidence Â»Argument undermined by neuroimaging evidence
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About