What we want to achieve with COI & peerspectives

• A set of practices that will 
  
  • Assist one in attaining more conscious execution and being
  • Assist one by providing trusted peers to help conduct these reflective retrospectives
  • Be at an appropriate (not too low, not too high) level of "overhead" so that it is "worth it"
  • Create a "field" effect that allows individual adjustment to take place locally, but influenced by and influencing a trusted community 

• A set of practices that will self-identify individuals with a community of others like-minded in their intent to become more conscious about being 

• A set of practices that will allow a high-integrity sharing of nuanced notions around a collection of values
  • wholeness, health, love, contribution, respect, integrity, acceptance, accountability, 
  • Allow for differences in each's interpretation
  • Allow for each individual to learn from these differences
  • Allow for the community to learn from these differences 

• A set of ...

Specifically, what happens in a peerspective?

• What was intended? (in this "go-around" aka iteration aka sprint) 

• What was achieved?
  • If an intended result was not achieved, 
    
    • What happened?
    • Did adjustment / adaptation happen well? 

• What changes need to be tried next?
  • Do anew?
  • Stop doing? 

• What do we not yet understand?
  • Put on backlog for future peerspectives 

• Write this up and make it shareable within COI (trusted community)

As a framework for other peerspectives

• Framework that is amenable to improvements, collected from throughout the COI 

• Perhaps "targetable" depending on different stakeholder / role types 

• Is there just ONE "sharability" withiin COI, or is there entity-specific sharing?
  • eg. Do I have my own trusted circle, or is the entire COI "trusted"?