|
Structuring the Pattern Language - Levels and variables to consider Question1 #329845 Preliminary Ideas | Christopher Alexander's fifteen fundamental properties of wholeness - Source.
The key points presented at the Workshop of the Ostrom Workshop: Our Perspective - Strategic
- Dynamic
- Systemic
- Trans-disciplinary
- Agency & action based
- Practical
- Evolutionary
The questions we endeavour to address - What are the forces & powers preventing the health and thrivability of the system?
- The commons beyond CPR? What are they, what is their systemic role?
- How do various movements and change agents relate to the commons and engage into action and change?
- How can we help leverage capacity and agency across the board?
- How can we help awareness of inter-actions and consequences?
- How can we foster understanding of diversity and complementrarity of action?
- How can we âjoin forcesâ, unite in diversity without losing focus?
- What can be learned and shared from the experience on the field? What can help change agents and communities on the ground? What tools can we produce?
- How can we embed the sustainability and thrivability of the system in the models and solutions we build?
- How can the âsustainabilityâ of sustainability and social change initiatives be assessed and vetted?
- How can we design for ongoing monitoring of outcomes and readjustment of models and practices?
- What heuristics, inquiry system need to be developed -ex: limits and inflection points?
- How can we link theory and practice?
The pattern language envisioned is multi-variable multi-layered design ecosystem, constructed around the notion of 'social objects' as "centers" or nodes of embodiment of commons logic and 'connective tissue' that bring various cohesive elements together in a descriptive rather than prescriptive approach. The language would comprise (to be further refined after further work on underpinning elements): - A set of underlying design principles, the underlying logic, or 'grammar' including the dynamics and generative processes and feedback loops (emergent from natural forces at play or intended) which have an effect on flows, stocks (accumulation) and their distribution. This is the 'code' level that will enable the commons to be protected, nurtured, grown 'by design' and preserved against over-exploitation, abuse, or enclosure, as well as the anti-patterns and mechanisms to identify as corrupt, and to stay away from.These are independent from action logics and narratives.
- The heuristics, inquiry processes that will help combine complementary patterns to construct, deconstruct and reconstruct new solutions. This would include principles of pharmacology (Stiegler), taking into account notions of limits and optima beyond which a remedy becomes toxic (when a pattern becomes an anti-pattern), and enable self-regulation of pattern application such as described below, as well as provisions to avoid co-optation of a pattern.
- The derived building blocks, or 'vocabulary', that will help change agents in each cluster of engagement logic compose solutions and find pathways relevant to their context (which may at this granular level be prescriptive as this is where the praxis and effectiveness lies) and create the narratives, or expressions of these underlying principles in forms and narratives or realities they can relate to, and that will appropriately help operate change 'locally', with all the diversity and meshing generated across clusters.
- The ways of connecting the elements above to existing practical applications, the connections between these elements, and their relationship with cultural aspects and forms of sense making and engagement which would enable their easy discovery and retrieval, making databases of solutions 'actionable' â an 'orientation system', and which would also enable to navigate between domains.
- The protocols for 'conversation' within and between narratives or 'local languages', for mutual understanding in multi-stakeholder groups, discovery of each other's logics and operating modes, and dealing with conflicting interests, trade-offs, etc⊠in participatory processes.
- A framework for communication and communication charter or series of blueprints for artists, communicators, change agents to adapt and spread out via media, art, SOLE and Peer Learning accelerators, enabling self and peer discovery journeys.
- The tools and technologies that would make visualization, contextualization, matching, navigation, learning easier, that would enable people to embark on self- or group-discovery or learning journeys, navigate from the place they are at toward new possibilities starting with those that would seam the most 'natural' or effortless to them, and help change agents do their job more effectively...
The slides below show how Donella Meadow's framework can be used to go through the various types of levers or systemic intervention points. Observing what is going on on the ground, an operating in a reverse way to design for desired effects and outcomes.
|
+Citations (9) - CitationsAjouter une citationList by: CiterankMapLink[5] Tree of Knowledge (ToK) System (ontology)
En citant: Wikipedia, Gregg Henriques Cité par: Poor Richard 9:03 AM 7 June 2014 GMT URL: | Extrait - An interesting a top-level ontology:
"...a new unified theory of knowledge that maps the pieces of the scientific puzzle in a novel way that connects Quantum Mechanics to Sociological processes and everything in between into a coherent whole. The most novel aspect of the ToK is its visuo-spatial depiction of knowledge as consisting of four dimensions of complexity (Matter, Life, Mind, and Culture) that correspond to the behavior of four classes of objects (material objects, organisms, animals, and humans), and four classes of science (physical, biological, psychological, and social)."
|
Link[8] A dictionary for an economics of the commons
En citant: Poor Richard Publication info: May 25, 2013 Cité par: Poor Richard 9:25 AM 7 June 2014 GMT URL:
| Extrait - This is a proposal in response to âHelp us build a dictionary on commons economics!â, an article recently posted at The Economics of the Commons Conference (ECC 2013) Communications Platform website (commonsandeconomics.org)
I. A list of words with links to wikipedia articles
II. Secondly, we might consider referring to some existing top-level vocabularies (data dictionaries, ontologies, etc.) and perhaps building the commons-based economics vocabulary as an extension (specialized domain) of one or more of these.
Below is a graphic of the GoodRelations e-comerce vocabulary[1]. I include this graphic not for its specific terminology but because it conveys several concepts at a glance. The use of a Unified Modeling Language (UML) diagram would allow us to show terms grouped into logical classes and the relationships between those classes. But this is not only a step towards a standardized and machine-readable dictionary of terms; it is also a model of economic processes. I think this would be a very useful kind of model to create for an Economics of the Commons. Rather than invent the Commons Economy Model from scratch we could borrow from existing models like GoodRelations and adapt them as necessary.
At the most basic level, such a diagram would allow us to hyperlink each term to a standard definition such as those given in the UNITED NATIONS METADATA COMMON VOCABULARY[2]. Note that in the UN Metadata dictionary each term is not only defined but there are references to relevant organizations, standards, specifications, urls, etc.
1. http://www.heppnetz.de... 2. http://unstats.un.org/...
|
|
|