More brains can be brought together
With more people contributing a wider range of knowledge and perspectives can be obtained. Even if "stupid" questions are asked, these may be sufficient to prompt others to ask better formed questions.
The debate can be described as a participative process as many different actors are involved.  However, most participants do not have a broad and comprehensive view of the problem. In other words, each participant has its own vision of the problem, and its own knowledge and information. Once confronted to other opinions, arguments, results the participant may realise that is not exactly what it has expected. So he can add new or revised knowledge, rule, values, preferences, etc. during the process.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment? »Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?
In Support of the Proposition »In Support of the Proposition
The involvement of many debaters may lead to better quality results »The involvement of many debaters may lead to better quality results
Agree »Agree
More brains can be brought together
A debate with an unclear structure may not give a reasoned outcome »A debate with an unclear structure may not give a reasoned outcome
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About