The results could be manipulated or gamed for dubious purposes
Does this mean crowdsourcing is inherently unsuited to framing a balanced risk assessment? Might it not in fact be that an open debate exposes actors operating for dubious purposes? Expert panels may have just as much potential to be manipulated - their composition might have been decided on political grounds for example.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment? »Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?
Against the Proposition »Against the Proposition
The results could be manipulated or gamed for dubious purposes
Agree »Agree
Neutral »Neutral
Disagree »Disagree
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About