Details view: Disagree

Views
Add
Edit
- Edit page
- Delete page
Share
Login
- Member login
- Register now for a free account
🔎

Disagree Opinion1 #306169

Immediately related elementsHow this works

Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment? »Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?☜Many risk researchers see a need to improve the theory and practice of risk management, and policy organisations want alternatives to traditional practices like consulting expert opinion and resolving issues through public policy and debate. Can a suitable methodology be found to crowdsource, i.e. harness the power of a large and diverse group of people using the power of the internet, risk assessments? What are the potential upsides; where do the pitfalls appear and can these be avoided?☜F1CEB7

▲

In Support of the Proposition »In Support of the PropositionIn Support of the Proposition☜Arguments in support of the proposition that crowdsourcing can facilitate multi-disciplinary risk assessment. ☜59C6EF

▲

The debate is transparent to all who wish to participate »The debate is transparent to all who wish to participateThe debate is transparent to all who wish to participate☜Everything is open and competing positions can be analysed and compared by anyone with relevant interest and expertise☜98CE71

■

DisagreeDisagree☜☜59C6EF

●

Participants enter and leave debates at differing times »Participants enter and leave debates at differing timesParticipants enter and leave debates at differing times☜Participants enter and leave debates at differing times, few follow a debate through from start to finish. This means individuals only get snapshots of the debate. Moreover if there are very many participants, so much data is generated that there is no way to have an overview of a whole debate landscape.☜FFB597

●

Internet mediated crowdsourcing selects for a narrow demographic »Internet mediated crowdsourcing selects for a narrow demographicInternet mediated crowdsourcing selects for a narrow demographic☜To participate in an internet debate requires access to the internet and the (cultural) know-how to contribute. Naturally this selects for a particular demographic, namely the younger generations and those not on the lowest incomes. Moreover, only those who want to contribute, not all those who can, will. Both these factors will add a bias to any crowdsourced debate☜98CE71

Heading

Summary

Click the button to enter task scheduling information

Details

Enter task details

Message text

Select assignee(s)

Due date (click calendar)

RadDatePicker

Open the calendar popup.

Calendar

Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<	<	November 2024	>	<<

November 2024
	S	M	T	W	T	F	S
44	27	28	29	30	31	1	2
45	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
46	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
47	17	18	19	20	21	22	23
48	24	25	26	27	28	29	30
49	1	2	3	4	5	6	7

Reminder

Ready to post Copy to text

Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered

Lock

Comment graphing options

Choose comments:Comment onlyWhole threadAll comments

Choose location:To a new mapTo this map

New map options

Select map ontology Graph to private map

+Commentaires (0)

- CommentairesAjouter un commentaireNewest firstOldest firstShow threads

+Citations (0)

- CitationsAjouter une citationList by: CiterankMap

+About

- About

Entrée par: Torran Elson
NodeID: #306169
Node type: Position
Date d'entrée (GMT): 12/11/2013 4:53:00 PM
Date de la dernière modification (Heure GMT): 12/11/2013 4:53:00 PM
Show other editors
Corrélations entrantes: 0
Corrélations sortantes: 0
Evaluation moyenne: 2 by 1 utilisateurs

x Select file to upload