Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Neutral
Opinion
1
#306132
Immediately related elements
How this works
-
Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment? »
Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?
Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?☜Many risk researchers see a need to improve the theory and practice of risk management, and policy organisations want alternatives to traditional practices like consulting expert opinion and resolving issues through public policy and debate. Can a suitable methodology be found to crowdsource, i.e. harness the power of a large and diverse group of people using the power of the internet, risk assessments? What are the potential upsides; where do the pitfalls appear and can these be avoided?☜F1CEB7
▲
In Support of the Proposition »
In Support of the Proposition
In Support of the Proposition☜Arguments in support of the proposition that crowdsourcing can facilitate multi-disciplinary risk assessment. ☜59C6EF
▲
The involvement of many debaters may lead to better quality results »
The involvement of many debaters may lead to better quality results
The involvement of many debaters may lead to better quality results☜By analogy with open source software the involvement of many debaters may lead to better quality and better maintained results. A contributor to a debate may refine his or her arguments in response to open discussion; one participant may extend or clarify as well as find flaws in the arguments of another.☜98CE71
■
Neutral
Neutral☜☜59C6EF
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Commentaires (
0
)
- Commentaires
Ajouter un commentaire
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Ajouter une citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entrée par:
Torran Elson
NodeID:
#306132
Node type:
Position
Date d'entrée (GMT):
12/11/2013 4:26:00 PM
Date de la dernière modification (Heure GMT):
12/11/2013 4:26:00 PM
Show other editors
Corrélations entrantes:
0
Corrélations sortantes:
0
Evaluation moyenne:
1
by
1
utilisateurs
x
Select file to upload