Details view: Agree

Views
Add
Edit
- Edit page
- Delete page
Share
Login
- Member login
- Register now for a free account
🔎

Agree Opinion1 #306126

Immediately related elementsHow this works

Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment? »Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?☜Many risk researchers see a need to improve the theory and practice of risk management, and policy organisations want alternatives to traditional practices like consulting expert opinion and resolving issues through public policy and debate. Can a suitable methodology be found to crowdsource, i.e. harness the power of a large and diverse group of people using the power of the internet, risk assessments? What are the potential upsides; where do the pitfalls appear and can these be avoided?☜F1CEB7

▲

Against the Proposition »Against the PropositionAgainst the Proposition☜Arguments against the proposition that crowdsourcing can facilitate multi-disciplinary risk assessment. ☜59C6EF

▲

The public isn’t competent to understand many risk assessment issues »The public isn’t competent to understand many risk assessment issuesThe public isn’t competent to understand many risk assessment issues☜In certain instances arguments hinge on technical and scientific questions. The general public does not have the expertise to understand these matters, let alone provide coherent arguments about them. In a crowdsourcing environment, how can these key technical issues be identified? And once identified, can they be communicated effectively by experts to the general public? Can crowdsourcing meld effectively with this more traditional approach to risk assessment?☜98CE71

■

AgreeAgree☜☜59C6EF

●

Not all people can be experts in all topics »Not all people can be experts in all topicsNot all people can be experts in all topics☜Although, in general, the crowd is capable of understanding difficult arguments, most people will not have the right background to access the technical points key to many risk assessments☜9FDEF6

●

Those who are experts, could form the crowd. »Those who are experts, could form the crowd.Those who are experts, could form the crowd.☜A subset of the general population, those who are experts, could form the crowd. This could be viewed as much wider expert panel. e.g. Polymath project.☜98CE71

●

Argumentation Theory can be used to get around this objection. »Argumentation Theory can be used to get around this objection.Argumentation Theory can be used to get around this objection.☜☜EF597B

Heading

Summary

Click the button to enter task scheduling information

Details

Enter task details

Message text

Select assignee(s)

Due date (click calendar)

RadDatePicker

Open the calendar popup.

Calendar

Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<	<	July 2024	>	<<

July 2024
	S	M	T	W	T	F	S
27	30	1	2	3	4	5	6
28	7	8	9	10	11	12	13
29	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
30	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
31	28	29	30	31	1	2	3
32	4	5	6	7	8	9	10

Reminder

Ready to post Copy to text

Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered

Lock

Comment graphing options

Choose comments:Comment onlyWhole threadAll comments

Choose location:To a new mapTo this map

New map options

Select map ontology Graph to private map

+Commentaires (0)

- CommentairesAjouter un commentaireNewest firstOldest firstShow threads

+Citations (0)

- CitationsAjouter une citationList by: CiterankMap

+About

- About

Entrée par: Torran Elson
NodeID: #306126
Node type: Position
Date d'entrée (GMT): 12/11/2013 4:22:00 PM
Date de la dernière modification (Heure GMT): 12/11/2013 4:22:00 PM
Show other editors
Corrélations entrantes: 0
Corrélations sortantes: 0
Evaluation moyenne: 5 by 1 utilisateurs

x Select file to upload