Independent --> Interdependent
The Enlightenment allowed us to see ourselves as individuals and agents. Free from supernatural authority, people were first allowed and then expected to act independently and selfishly for themselves. This extraordinary cultural shift sparked invention, innovation, and the autonomy we expect in our daily lives. But this mode of thinking, particularly applied to the American frontier, persuaded us that we were independent rather than interdependent. A new understanding of systems and human behavior and physiology shows this to be untrue. From the quantum level up, we are far more interdependent than our politics and culture generally let us think. We are at all times both cause and effect. Our mirror neurons and evolved social rites mean that how we behave influences how others behave, and how they behave influences us. The permutating patterns formed by those interactions become the shape our societies take. And obviously, the denser and more connected the network—compare, say, America today with America 300 years ago—the greater these effects.

Liu, Eric; Hanauer, Nick (2011-12-06). The Gardens of Democracy: A New American Story of Citizenship, the Economy, and the Role of Government (Kindle Locations 353-360). Perseus Books Group. Kindle Edition. 
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Gardens of Democracy »Gardens of Democracy
True Self-Interest Is Mutual Interest »True Self-Interest Is Mutual Interest
Radical Redefinition of Self-Interest »Radical Redefinition of Self-Interest
Independent --> Interdependent
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About