Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
The geometry of thought
Question
1
#121204
Semantic
Making sense and unfolding... by association
Immediately related elements
How this works
-
The Living We: An Ecology for Transformative Action »
The Living We: An Ecology for Transformative Action
The Living We: An Ecology for Transformative Action☜We, inspired, empowered and enabled individually and collectively from the place we hold in the greater whole- to leverage our individual and collective potential and the resources around us in a coordinated yet self-directed way, and to initiate and LIVE the change WE want to see... ☜F1CEB7
▲
Unleashing Human Agency »
Unleashing Human Agency
Unleashing Human Agency☜Many are calling for change but dont know where, how to start. People need to be able to access and understand possibilities, be inspired enough to intent action, feel empowered enough to carry it out, and enabled enough to be the change they want to see, individually and collectively...☜FFB597
▲
An Emergent WE »
An Emergent WE
An Emergent WE☜☜FFB597
▲
Powered by Humanity »
Powered by Humanity
Powered by Humanity☜The semantics are in the user, not the system Clay ShirkyHere is the damn information, you make the decision. You are the human. Im just a machine. IBM System of systems☜FFB597
■
The geometry of thought
The geometry of thought☜Semantic☜FFB597
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Commentaires (
0
)
- Commentaires
Ajouter un commentaire
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
1
)
- Citations
Ajouter une citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
Link
[1]
Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought
En citant:
Peter Gärdenfors
Cité par:
Helene Finidori
11:24 AM 15 October 2011 GMT
URL:
http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=10193
Extrait -
Within cognitive science, two approaches currently dominate the problem of modeling representations. The symbolic approach views cognition as computation involving symbolic manipulation. Connectionism, a special case of associationism, models associations using artificial neuron networks. Peter Gardenfors offers his theory of conceptual representations as a bridge between the symbolic and connectionist approaches.
Symbolic representation is particularly weak at modeling concept learning, which is paramount for understanding many cognitive phenomena. Concept learning is closely tied to the notion of similarity, which is also poorly served by the symbolic approach. Gardenfors's theory of conceptual spaces presents a framework for representing information on the conceptual level. A conceptual space is built up from geometrical structures based on a number of quality dimensions. The main applications of the theory are on the constructive side of cognitive science: as a constructive model the theory can be applied to the development of artificial systems capable of solving cognitive tasks. Gardenfors also shows how conceptual spaces can serve as an explanatory framework for a number of empirical theories, in particular those concerning concept formation, induction, and semantics. His aim is to present a coherent research program that can be used as a basis for more detailed investigations.
+About
- About
Entrée par:
Helene Finidori
NodeID:
#121204
Node type:
Issue
Date d'entrée (GMT):
10/15/2011 9:19:00 AM
Date de la dernière modification (Heure GMT):
10/15/2011 1:31:00 PM
Show other editors
Corrélations entrantes:
0
Corrélations sortantes:
0
Evaluation moyenne:
0
by
0
utilisateurs
x
Select file to upload