No mental activity is conscious
None of the processing that results in conscious experiences is itself conscious—eg when we consciously see an image of a chair and a table standing out against a background, we have no conscious experience of assembling them to make a chair.

K Lashley (1956).

Note: Searle views his connection principal argument as being in part a response to this claim.

See the "Does the connection principle show that consciousness is necessary to thought?" arguments on this map.

Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
No: computers can't be conscious [6] »No: computers can't be conscious [6]
▲
Consciousness is necessary to thought »Consciousness is necessary to thought
■
No mental activity is conscious
►
Consciousness is necessary to thought »Consciousness is necessary to thought
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About