Using Brown v. Board of Education is bad legal precedent.
Extending racial segregation rulings to the issue of same-sex marriage would result in other Constitutional infringements.
The result of Brown v. Board was that schools had to racially integrate their facilities in order to provide education.  While there are other legal arguments that may support legal same-sex marriages, this one in particular is build upon the use of facilities in providing services.  The logical extention of using Brown v. Board is that churches must integrate same-sex couples into their marriage services.  This violates the free exercise clause of the first amendment.  If you want to use legal precedent to argue in favor of same-sex marriage, use another ruling.
Immediately related elementsHow this works
-
Argumentation and Debate - 38205 »Argumentation and Debate - 38205
Kenneth Rebella »Kenneth Rebella
Gay marriage  »Gay marriage
it is an issue of discrimination  »it is an issue of discrimination
Separate is not equal »Separate is not equal
Comparison is a false analogy. »Comparison is a false analogy.
Using Brown v. Board of Education is bad legal precedent.
Fundmental misunderstanding, and a slippery slope. »Fundmental misunderstanding, and a slippery slope.
+Commentaires (0)
+Citations (0)
+About