US Defence spending is far less cost-effective
USIP's funding is less than one-hundredth of 1 percent of the Pentagon’s budget, which is spent far less cost-effectively. So why single out the USIP for budget cuts?
CONTEXT(Help)
-
The Future of the US Institute of Peace »The Future of the US Institute of Peace
▲
Congressional Funding of USIP? »Congressional Funding of USIP?
▲
Withdraw Congressional funding »Withdraw Congressional funding
▲
Necessary cost-saving measure »Necessary cost-saving measure
▲
Congressional spending on USIP isn't cost-effective »Congressional spending on USIP isn't cost-effective
▲
Other forms of public expenditure are far less cost-effective »Other forms of public expenditure are far less cost-effective
■
US Defence spending is far less cost-effective
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About