Three-level distinction is too simple
The three levels distinction is too simple. There are more levels and modelling strategies than just three.
Gardner Quarnton (1988).
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a] »Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
▲
The Subsymbolic Paradigm »The Subsymbolic Paradigm
▲
Smolensky's treatment of levels is problematic »Smolensky's treatment of levels is problematic
■
Three-level distinction is too simple
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About