Obama's support for "Clean coal" illustrates scientific naivité
Throughout the campaign Obama mentioned clean coal as a viable source of energy.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
What should Obama do next? »What should Obama do next?
▲
Science, Technology and the Internet »Science, Technology and the Internet
▲
Science and Public Policy? »Science and Public Policy?
▲
Science should play a stronger role in US policy development. »Science should play a stronger role in US policy development.
▲
Is the curent team assembled by Obama up to the job? »Is the curent team assembled by Obama up to the job?
▲
Yes, Obama's team has the requisite experience »Yes, Obama's team has the requisite experience
▲
Inexperience indicated by naivité on alternative energy »Inexperience indicated by naivité on alternative energy
■
Obama's support for "Clean coal" illustrates scientific naivité
●
Physical analysis suggests costs of sequestration are too great »Physical analysis suggests costs of sequestration are too great
●
Support for Clean Coal was just campaign politics  »Support for Clean Coal was just campaign politics
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About