Extra-judicial US actions will be cited as precedent by other regimes OpposingArgument1 #86803 The US Government's extra-judicial pursuit of Wikileaks will be cited as precedent by other regimes. |
|
+Citations (1)
- CitationsAdd new citationList by: CiterankMapLink[1]
Author: Clay Shirky Cited by: David Price 1:27 PM 21 December 2010 GMT Citerank: (3) 85253Private conversations are essential in negotiation"For negotiation to work, people’s stated positions have to change, but change is seen, almost universally, as weakness. People trying to come to consensus must be able to privately voice opinions they would publicly abjure, and may later abandon. Wikileaks plainly damages those abilities" C. Shirky1198CE71, 85955Secrecy is warranted in some but not all circumstances959C6EF, 86804Successful negotiation sometimes requires opacity1198CE71 URL:
|
Excerpt / Summary "I think the current laws, which criminalize the leaking of secrets but not the publishing of leaks, strike the right balance. However, as a citizen of a democracy, I’m willing to be voted down, and I’m willing to see other democratically proposed restrictions on Wikileaks put in place. It may even be that whatever checks and balances do get put in place by the democratic process make anything like Wikileaks impossible to sustain in the future.
The key, though, is that democracies have a process for creating such restrictions, and as a citizen it sickens me to see the US trying to take shortcuts. The leaders of Myanmar and Belarus, or Thailand and Russia, can now rightly say to us “You went after Wikileaks’ domain name, their hosting provider, and even denied your citizens the ability to register protest through donations, all without a warrant and all targeting overseas entities, simply because you decided you don’t like the site. If that’s the way governments get to behave, we can live with that.” |