In Double's account brains lack understanding
Double thinks that a part of a system, such as a homunculus in a Japanese Room, can't understand in a way that the whole system can. Based on this account, a brain in a person can't understand in the way that a person as a whole can.
C.A. Fields, 1984.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3] »Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
▲
The Chinese Room Argument [4] »The Chinese Room Argument [4]
▲
The Systems Reply »The Systems Reply
▲
Man in room not in position to judge »Man in room not in position to judge
■
In Double's account brains lack understanding
●
Mistakes epistemological argument for a metaphysical one »Mistakes epistemological argument for a metaphysical one
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About