The Systems Reply
We can consider the person in the room as part of a total system that includes the rule book, scratch paper, and data banks of Chinese symbols. The whole system, not only the person should be regarded as understanding Chinese.
Anticipated by John Searle 1908a, 1980b, 1990b.

CONTEXT(Help)
-
Artificial Intelligence »Artificial Intelligence
▲
Can computers think? [1] »Can computers think? [1]
▲
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3] »Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
▲
The Chinese Room Argument [4] »The Chinese Room Argument [4]
■
The Systems Reply
●
Chinese Room argument commits fallacy of composition »Chinese Room argument commits fallacy of composition
●
Man in room not in position to judge »Man in room not in position to judge
●
Systems reply misses the point »Systems reply misses the point
●
The Internalisation Reply »The Internalisation Reply
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About