| pros/cons vs supporters/detracters  Component1 #6512 
 | 
| One idea I had is to distinguish the following entity types: 
 - pros/cons - attached directly to options/ideas, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses 
 - supporters/detracters - a tree of claims attached to a pro or con, representing the debate about whether it is true or not 
 This makes the ontology bigger, increasing the learning curve, but it does think I distinguish between two logically differing map roles (evaluation vs arguments) and may thus reduce confusion overall. |