Details view: Conditions necessary to enable a ban arent in place

Views
Add
Edit
- Edit page
- Delete page
Share
Login
- Member login
- Register now for a free account
🔎

Conditions necessary to enable a ban aren't in place OpposingArgument1 #61757 It would be premature to pursue a Nuclear Weapons Convention now, as many of the conditions necessary to enable a ban aren't in place.

CONTEXT(Help)

Nuclear Politics »Nuclear PoliticsNuclear Politics☜Since the Trinity test in New Mexico in 1945, Russia, the UK, France and China have joined the US as nuclear weapon states—with India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea also thought to possess a nuclear weapons capability. Help us map the issues around civil and military nuclear proliferation.☜F1CEB7

▲

Nuclear challenges for the international community? »Nuclear challenges for the international community?Nuclear challenges for the international community?☜What are the key challenges for the international community with respect to nuclear proliferation? And how can the international community respond effectively to those challenges?☜FFB597

▲

Nuclear disarmament »Nuclear disarmamentNuclear disarmament☜The international community needs to make progress towards the goal of nuclear disarmament—and, eventually, persuade all of the existing nuclear weapon states give up their weapons.☜59C6EF

▲

Potential nuclear disarmament steps? »Potential nuclear disarmament steps?Potential nuclear disarmament steps?☜What nuclear disarmament measures and steps might be taken?☜FFB597

▲

Pursue a Nuclear Weapons Convention »Pursue a Nuclear Weapons ConventionPursue a Nuclear Weapons Convention☜Governments should seek to advance disarmament by agreeing to begin work on a legally binding, irreversible and verifiable Nuclear Weapons Convention banning and eliminating all nuclear weapons.☜59C6EF

■

Conditions necessary to enable a ban aren't in placeConditions necessary to enable a ban aren't in place☜It would be premature to pursue a Nuclear Weapons Convention now, as many of the conditions necessary to enable a ban arent in place.☜EF597B

Heading

Summary

Click the button to enter task scheduling information

Details

Enter task details

Message text

Select assignee(s)

Due date (click calendar)

RadDatePicker

Open the calendar popup.

Calendar

Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<	<	November 2024	>	<<

November 2024
	S	M	T	W	T	F	S
44	27	28	29	30	31	1	2
45	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
46	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
47	17	18	19	20	21	22	23
48	24	25	26	27	28	29	30
49	1	2	3	4	5	6	7

Reminder

Ready to post Copy to text

Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered

Lock

Comment graphing options

Choose comments:Comment onlyWhole threadAll comments

Choose location:To a new mapTo this map

New map options

Select map ontology Graph to private map

+Comments (0)

- CommentsAdd a commentNewest firstOldest firstShow threads

+Citations (1)

- CitationsAdd new citationList by: CiterankMap

Link[1]

Author: UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Cited by: David Price 1:27 AM 18 May 2010 GMT
Citerank: (3) 61758A NWC would be counterproductive13EF597B, 128408Conditions necessary to enable a ban aren't in placeIt would be premature to pursue a Nuclear Weapons Convention now, as many of the conditions necessary to enable a ban aren't in place.13EF597B, 128499A NWC would be counterproductive13EF597B
URL:

http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/pdf1/nuclear-paper

Excerpt / Summary

LIFTING THE NUCLEAR SHADOW: Creating the Conditions for Abolishing Nuclear Weapons.

+About

- About

Entered by:- David Price
NodeID: #61757
Node type: OpposingArgument
Entry date (GMT): 5/18/2010 1:25:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT): 5/18/2010 1:26:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations: 0
Outgoing cross-relations: 0
Average rating: 0 by 0 users

x Select file to upload