Can't move effectively towards abolition and maintain a deterrent SupportiveArgument1 #56165 There is an inherent contradiction between moving effectively towards abolition and maintaining, at the same time, a technically, operationally, and politically credible nuclear deterrent. |
|
+Citations (1)
- CitationsAdd new citationList by: CiterankMapLink[1]
Author: Bruno Tertrais Cited by: David Price 7:55 PM 5 April 2010 GMT Citerank: (3) 55693French progress on nuclear disarmamentExamples of French progress on nuclear disarmament1198CE71, 128568Can't move effectively towards abolition and maintain a deterrentThere is an inherent contradiction between moving effectively towards abolition and maintaining, at the same time, a technically, operationally, and politically credible nuclear deterrent.1198CE71, 128580French progress on nuclear disarmamentExamples of French progress on nuclear disarmament1198CE71 URL:
|
Excerpt / Summary French analysts – including this author – are keen to point out that there is an inherent contradiction between moving effectively towards abolition and maintaining, at the same time, a technically, operationally, and politically credible nuclear deterrent. In other words, it is by no means certain that you can have your cake and eat it – take concrete steps towards abolition and "maintain a safe, secure and effective arsenal to deter any adversary," as President Obama promised in Prague. London may soon find itself embroiled in this contradiction due to large expenses that will be needed to replace its Trident submarines. |