Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
US will only have to get rid of 100 warheads
SupportiveArgument
1
#56133
In practice, the START follow-on treaty only requires the US to get red of 100 nuclear warheads (from its current position).
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Nuclear Politics »
Nuclear Politics
Nuclear Politics☜Since the Trinity test in New Mexico in 1945, Russia, the UK, France and China have joined the US as nuclear weapon states—with India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea also thought to possess a nuclear weapons capability. Help us map the issues around civil and military nuclear proliferation.☜F1CEB7
▲
Nuclear treaties and key texts? »
Nuclear treaties and key texts?
Nuclear treaties and key texts?☜What are the key documents that are shaping, and will shape, the direction of nuclear politics? Help us develop a comprehensive list here.☜FFB597
▲
Nuclear Treaties »
Nuclear Treaties
Nuclear Treaties☜☜FFB597
▲
New START follow-on Treaty »
New START follow-on Treaty
New START follow-on Treaty☜President Obama announced an agreement with President Medvedev on a new START Treaty on 26 March 2010. The START follow-on Treaty was signed in Prague on 8 April 2010.☜FFB597
▲
Does the New START Treaty entail significant warhead cuts? »
Does the New START Treaty entail significant warhead cuts?
Does the New START Treaty entail significant warhead cuts?☜☜FFB597
▲
START follow-on Treaty entails significant cuts in warheads »
START follow-on Treaty entails significant cuts in warheads
START follow-on Treaty entails significant cuts in warheads☜Under the Treaty, the U.S. and Russia will be limited to significantly fewer strategic arms within seven years from the date the Treaty enters into force.☜59C6EF
▲
Majority of cuts already implemented prior to START follow-on Treaty »
Majority of cuts already implemented prior to START follow-on Treaty
Majority of cuts already implemented prior to START follow-on Treaty☜In effect, the new limits defined in the START follow-on Treaty set new ceilings close to the reductions that Russia and the US have already achieved.☜EF597B
■
US will only have to get rid of 100 warheads
US will only have to get rid of 100 warheads☜In practice, the START follow-on treaty only requires the US to get red of 100 nuclear warheads (from its current position).☜98CE71
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#56133
Node type:
SupportiveArgument
Entry date (GMT):
4/5/2010 4:15:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
4/5/2010 4:15:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload