Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Self awareness
Component
1
#53320
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Abortion »
Abortion
Abortion☜A map exploring the issues arising in the abortion debate.☜F1CEB7
▲
Definition of Person »
Definition of Person
Definition of Person☜Central to the debate about abortion is the question of what defines a person. Often, the point of stasis in this debate involves the moment that a persons life begins and when their rights as such should be recognized by society.☜FFB597
▲
A mind defines a person »
A mind defines a person
A mind defines a person☜It is a mind (or perhaps a mind with certain properties) that defines a person.☜59C6EF
■
Self awareness
Self awareness☜☜9FDEF6
●
How is self-awareness measured? »
How is self-awareness measured?
How is self-awareness measured?☜☜FFB597
●
The distinguishing feature must be unique to human beings »
The distinguishing feature must be unique to human beings
The distinguishing feature must be unique to human beings☜Whatever basis we choose for granting a right to life must be unique to human beings, or otherwise we would have to extend this right to other animals.☜98CE71
●
Undermines a right to life for newborns »
Undermines a right to life for newborns
Undermines a right to life for newborns☜☜EF597B
►
Mind is not a requirement for personhood »
Mind is not a requirement for personhood
Mind is not a requirement for personhood☜U.S. courts have already held that children born with anencephalia are human beings / persons and are worthy of the equal protections of our laws. Despite the fact that they are born with only a brain stem and no cerebral cortex and despite the fact that they have no capacity for thoughts, feelings or self awareness. Also, recent fetal homicide laws which make it a crime of murder to kill a child in the womb during a criminal act do not require the victim to be able to think or feel pain. ☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
1
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
Link
[1]
Philosopher's claim over moral right to kill newborns sparks outrage
Author:
Julie Robotham
Cited by:
(Del)Veronica S
8:55 AM 8 March 2012 GMT
Citerank:
(1)
86514
Universal values
This map explores the debate about whether some values are universal in the sense that they apply to all people irrespective of culture - as recognized in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
7
F1CEB7
URL:
http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life/philosophers-claim-over-moral-right-to-kill-newborns-sparks-outrage-20120301-1u61l.html
Excerpt / Summary
"Killing newborns is morally the same as abortion and should be permissible if the mother wishes it, Australian philosophers have argued in an article that has unleashed a firestorm of criticism and forced the British Medical Journal to defend its publication."
+About
- About
Entered by:-
James Gasson
NodeID:
#53320
Node type:
Component
Entry date (GMT):
2/27/2010 10:41:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT):
2/27/2010 10:41:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
1
Average rating:
3
by
2
users
x
Select file to upload