Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
People may argue later that the cirteria used to rate was flawed
SupportiveArgument
1
#51774
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Stirling Precinct 5 Workshops »
Stirling Precinct 5 Workshops
Stirling Precinct 5 Workshops☜☜F1CEB7
▲
What are the land use options for Precinct 5? »
What are the land use options for Precinct 5?
What are the land use options for Precinct 5?☜☜FFB597
▲
Retired land options? »
Retired land options?
Retired land options?☜☜FFB597
▲
Option 10: Walkway/cycleway »
Option 10: Walkway/cycleway
Option 10: Walkway/cycleway☜Option 10: Walkway/cycleway from city centre to La Garnage/Dongara St reserve☜59C6EF
▲
Sub options? »
Sub options?
Sub options?☜☜FFB597
▲
Option 10c: New laneway »
Option 10c: New laneway
Option 10c: New laneway☜☜59C6EF
▲
Green links not well supported »
Green links not well supported
Green links not well supported☜☜EF597B
▲
The green link option does not adhere to the broader land use criteria »
The green link option does not adhere to the broader land use criteria
The green link option does not adhere to the broader land use criteria☜☜FF97FF
▲
Issue? »
Issue?
Issue?☜☜FFB597
▲
The land use criteria are not suitable for assessing the green links »
The land use criteria are not suitable for assessing the green links
The land use criteria are not suitable for assessing the green links☜☜59C6EF
■
People may argue later that the cirteria used to rate was flawed
People may argue later that the cirteria used to rate was flawed☜☜98CE71
●
Should specific criteria for this option be defined? »
Should specific criteria for this option be defined?
Should specific criteria for this option be defined?☜☜FFB597
●
What should the criteria be? »
What should the criteria be?
What should the criteria be?☜☜FFB597
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
Teresa Culmsee
NodeID:
#51774
Node type:
SupportiveArgument
Entry date (GMT):
2/17/2010 8:25:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT):
2/17/2010 8:25:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload