Production date is burdensome
“This [production date] is meant to be in the documentation accompanying the shipment. It would be a long list for items such as cell phones where there may be many 100’s of phones in a shipment. We question the need as the separate packaging and test requirements already cover the issue of whether this is waste.”

From p. 2 of response by  New Zealand to Basel Secretariat. 2015. ‘Decision BC-12/5 | Technical Guidelines on Transboundary Movements of Electrical and Electronic Waste and Used Electrical and Electronic Equipment, in Particular Regarding the Distinction between Waste and Non-Waste under the Basel Convention’. http://www.basel.int/TheConvention/ConferenceoftheParties/Meetings/COP12/tabid/4248/mctl/ViewDetails/EventModID/8051/EventID/542/xmid/13027/Default.aspx.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »Electronic Waste
Draft Technical Guidelines »Draft Technical Guidelines
Issues »Issues
Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste »Situations in which used equipment is or is not waste
Appendix V: Issues for further work »Appendix V: Issues for further work
Residual life time and age of used equipment »Residual life time and age of used equipment
Use production date »Use production date
Production date is burdensome
Decision BC-12/5 »Decision BC-12/5
2015-06 Technical Guidelines on Waste & Non-Waste [2015 June 23] »2015-06 Technical Guidelines on Waste & Non-Waste [2015 June 23]
New Zealand »New Zealand
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About