Guidelines should support BAN Amendment.
BAN notes that the Amendment adopted in 1995 though not yet in force has been implemented, by many countries.

"The adoption of decision III/1 by a consensus of the Parties in 1995, calling for an amendment to the Convention banning the export of hazardous wastes from OECD/EU countries and Liechtenstein (proposed Annex VII), and its subsequent implementation by many countries has led to numerous national prohibitions, even while it is not as yet in global force as an amendment to the Convention. These national bans must be respected by all Parties under the rules of the Convention."

From p. 6 of response by BAN to Basel Secretariat. 2010. ‘Draft Technical Guidelines on Transboundary Movement of E-Waste, in Particular Regarding the Distinction between Waste and Non-Waste (Version 22 September 2010)’. http://www.basel.int/Implementation/Ewaste/TechnicalGuidelines/DevelopmentofTGs/tabid/2377/Default.aspx.

 

CONTEXT(Help)
-
Electronic Waste »Electronic Waste
Draft Technical Guidelines »Draft Technical Guidelines
Issues »Issues
Scope of Technical Guidelines needs clarification »Scope of Technical Guidelines needs clarification
Guidelines should support BAN Amendment.
Guidelines should not include a reference to Ban Amendment. »Guidelines should not include a reference to Ban Amendment.
2010-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2010 Sept] »2010-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2010 Sept]
Recognize the benefits of recovery »Recognize the benefits of recovery
Recognize benefits of repair and reuse »Recognize benefits of repair and reuse
2012-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 Sep] »2012-09 Draft Technical Guidelines [2012 Sep]
Basel Action Network »Basel Action Network
Recognize benefits of repair and reuse »Recognize benefits of repair and reuse
Recognize the benefits of recovery »Recognize the benefits of recovery
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About