Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Response to publication by Climate Research of a dissenting paper
SupportiveArgument
1
#41426
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Anthropogenic Climate Change »
Anthropogenic Climate Change
Anthropogenic Climate Change☜Mapping the causes, consequences and potential responses to climate change.☜F1CEB7
▲
Human impact on the Earth's climate? »
Human impact on the Earth's climate?
Human impact on the Earth's climate?☜Is human activity changing the Earths climate? To what extent are changes in the Earths climate being driving by human behavior?☜FFB597
▲
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear »
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear☜The case for significant anthropogenic forcing of the climate remains unclear.☜59C6EF
▲
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed »
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed☜☜98CE71
▲
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable »
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable☜The proccess behind the IPCC reports, on which much of the case for dangerous anthropengenic climate change rests, is not wholly reliable.☜98CE71
▲
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process »
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process
Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process☜☜98CE71
▲
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy »
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy
Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy☜☜FF97FF
▲
Individuals/small groups can't exclude peer-reviewed papers from IPCC »
Individuals/small groups can't exclude peer-reviewed papers from IPCC
Individuals/small groups can't exclude peer-reviewed papers from IPCC☜No individual or small group of scientists is in a position to exclude a peer-reviewed paper from an I.P.C.C. assessment.☜EF597B
▲
Peer-review process has been corrupted »
Peer-review process has been corrupted
Peer-review process has been corrupted☜☜EF597B
■
Response to publication by Climate Research of a dissenting paper
Response to publication by Climate Research of a dissenting paper☜☜98CE71
●
Climate Research published a dissenting article »
Climate Research published a dissenting article
Climate Research published a dissenting article☜☜FF97FF
●
Encourage colleagues not to cite Climate Research papers »
Encourage colleagues not to cite Climate Research papers
Encourage colleagues not to cite Climate Research papers☜☜FF97FF
●
Encourage colleagues not to submit papers to Climate Research »
Encourage colleagues not to submit papers to Climate Research
Encourage colleagues not to submit papers to Climate Research☜☜FF97FF
●
Phil Jones demanded Climate Research rid itself of troublesome editor »
Phil Jones demanded Climate Research rid itself of troublesome editor
Phil Jones demanded Climate Research rid itself of troublesome editor☜☜FF97FF
●
Suggest Climate Resaerch no longer a legitimate peer-reviewed journal »
Suggest Climate Resaerch no longer a legitimate peer-reviewed journal
Suggest Climate Resaerch no longer a legitimate peer-reviewed journal☜☜FF97FF
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
1
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
Link
[1]
Author:
Mark Steyn
Cited by:
David Price
4:54 PM 28 November 2009 GMT
Citerank:
(6)
41424
Peer-review process has been corrupted
13
EF597B
,
41432
Response to Geographical Research Letters
11
98CE71
,
41433
Tom Wigley suggested getting the goods on editor Jim Saiers
22
FF97FF
,
41434
Tom Wigley suggested going to Jim Saiers's boss to get him ousted
22
FF97FF
,
41435
Discussed keeping papers out of IPCC report
11
98CE71
,
41437
Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewers?
8
FFB597
URL:
http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=YjAxYzA3NmI0N2Y1MDVhYzdmM2JkZGIyMjE5ZWU2OTI=
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#41426
Node type:
SupportiveArgument
Entry date (GMT):
11/28/2009 4:54:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
11/28/2009 4:54:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload