Citerank: (60) 340964Tackling obesity in the UKWith concern growing that the Foresight analysis—that 50% of the UK population could be obese by 2050, at an annual cost to the nation of around £50 billion per year [2]—substantially underestimates the scale of the unfolding obesity crisis, the College of Contemporary Health is working with the wider policy community to develop a whole systems map of the obesity crisis and the potential responses.7F1CEB7, 348675Adopt a whole systems approach to obesityTackling obesity effectively—accomplishing a population wide-shift—requires a comprehensive and integrated whole systems approach, involving a range of measures focusing on individuals, social and other systems, including at the local and community level, and on the interrelated physical, physiological, social and cognitive factors that determine health outcomes.565CA4D9, 348767A potentially unsustainable financial burden on the health systemThe range of obesity's impacts makes accurate economic analysis challenging; however, a November 2014 study from the McKinsey Global Institute placed the annual economic impact on the UK at around $73bn (£46bn). Earlier analysis and modelling for the 2007 Foresight Report suggested a cost to the NHS of around £4.2bn annually to treat people with health problems related to elevated BMI and a total wider cost to the economy of around £15.8bn (rising to £27bn by 2015 and £49.9bn by 2050).57DE7179, 348770Tackling obesityMany policy interventions have been suggested to address the obesity crisis across multiple studies—and indeed many such measures have been implemented, and are being implemented, now. There's recognition too that these interventions need to be part of a coherent and comprehensive whole systems strategy [4]; with some grounds for optimism that such an approach has the potential to accomplish a significant reduction in the prevalence of obesity in the UK across the next decade. [2]565CA4D9, 348780Causes of obesityUnderstanding the causes of obesity is critical to the success of prevention and treatment strategies. However, while (simply put) obesity occurs when energy intake from food and drink consumption is greater than energy expenditure through the body’s metabolism and physical activity over a prolonged period (resulting in the accumulation of excess body fat), in reality many complex behavioural and societal factors contribute systemically to the current crisis and no single influence dominates.555CD992, 352311Lost productivityObesity has as a serious impact on UK economic development –  constraining economic productivity and increasing business costs – affecting individuals’ ability to get and hold down work, their self-esteem and their underlying mental health.57DE7179, 352311Lost productivityObesity has as a serious impact on UK economic development –  constraining economic productivity and increasing business costs – affecting individuals’ ability to get and hold down work, their self-esteem and their underlying mental health.57DE7179, 352373Invest in weight management servicesThe departments of health in the four nations should extend and increase the provision of weight management services across the country, to mirror the provision of smoking cessation services.565CA4D9, 352710Develop better pharmaceutical obesity therapiesObesity drug sales are forecast to $3.8bn globally in 2018 [2]—in comparison to $57bn for Diabetes drug sales[2]—with evidence suggesting that the modest average weight losses achieved with current anti-obesity agents may be of some clinical benefit [5]. However, the current generation of drugs, which act on the central nervous system to suppress appetite, have raised significant health concerns—including psychiatric disorders, such as suicidal behaviour, depression, and cardiovascular problems.565CA4D9, 352718Invest in employee health and wellbeingEncourage organisations to invest employee health and wellbeing; including a health risk assessment and the provision of resources to help employees address the factors that pose the greatest risk to their health and wellness. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]565CA4D9, 366161McKinsey Global InstituteThe MGI discussion paper, Overcoming obesity: An initial economic analysis studied studied 74 interventions (in 18 areas) that are being discussed or piloted somewhere around the world to address obesity, including subsidized school meals for all, calorie and nutrition labeling, restrictions on advertising high-calorie food and drinks, and public-health campaigns – with sufficient data found on 44 of the interventions in 16 areas. 58D3ABAB, 366169Obesity Interventions identified by MGI74 interventions – across 18 groups – to reduce obesity.565CA4D9, 366449Deploy and integrate as many interventions as possible at scaleCommission and deploy as many interventions as possible at scale and delivered effectively, and integrated way, by the full range of sectors in society.565CA4D9, 366450Understand how to align incentives and build cooperation109FDEF6, 366453Many interventions are highly cost-effectiveAlmost all of the interventions we analyzed are highly cost-effective from the viewpoint of society.1198CE71, 366454Education and personal responsibility are necessary but not sufficientEducation and encouraging personal responsibility are necessary but not sufficient.1198CE71, 366456Co-ordinated multi-party actions are required to tackle obesityCapturing the full potential impact is likely to require commitment from government, employers, educators, retailers, restaurants, and food and beverage manufacturers, and a combination of top-down corporate and government interventions and bottom-up community-based ones. 1198CE71, 366457Government obesity efforts are too fragmented to be effectiveGovernment efforts to tackle the obesity issue seem too fragmented to be effective. In the United Kingdom, 15 central government departments; all local authorities with responsibility for health, education, and local planning; 16 EU directorates-general; and a wide range of nongovernmental organizations all have a significant impact on the major intervention areas. [1]118FF4888, 366458Current incentives are mis-aligned118FF4888, 366460Desire to prioritise options becomes a barrier to actionA search for the “best” interventions or a single solution could delay action and displace responsibility. Given the seriousness of the obesity issue, the aim should be to do as much as possible as soon as possible. [1]118FF4888, 366462Experiment with multiple interventionsSociety should be prepared to experiment with possible interventions. In many intervention areas, impact data from high-quality, randomized control trials are not possible to gather. So, rather than waiting for such data, the relevant sectors of society should be pragmatic with a bias toward action, especially where the risks of intervening are low, using trial and error to flesh out their understanding of potential solutions. 565CA4D9, 366463Paucity of investment in intervention measuresThe UK invests less than $1 billion a year in prevention activities such as weight-management programs and public health campaigns – i.e. around 1% of the social cost of obesity in the UK. More investment is required.555CD992, 366467Encourage active transport (walking and cycling)Government authorities redesign urban planning to facilitate and encourage walking and cycling.565CA4D9, 366479Align the school curriculum with obesity, nutrition and activity goals565CA4D9, 366479Align the school curriculum with obesity, nutrition and activity goals565CA4D9, 366481Improve surgical interventions for obesity565CA4D9, 366483Types of weight-management services565CA4D9, 366555Employers offer team challenge incentive schemes in the workplaceEmployers provide team challenge activities to encourage physical activity and improved key health indicators in the workplace.565CA4D9, 366557Employers give employees financial incentives to improve healthEmployers provide material incentives to individuals for improved key health indicators (e.g., discounts on insurance premiums, gym membership, prizes).565CA4D9, 366827Develop a coherent fiscal, regulatory and governance frameworkTake every opportunity, iteratively over time, to bring the public fiscal, regulatory and governance framework into alignment with public health goals on obesity. Use taxes, subsidies, targets and pricing signals to incentivise change in behaviour, supply and consumption by aligning measures with the health properties of food and drink and behaviour—and seek, wherever practical, to amplify positive patterns that are aligned with the policy goals and damp those that pull against.565CA4D9, 371556Many obesity policy measures appear to be cost-effective for societyThe recent MGI study [1] reported that almost all of the obesity policy interventions included in its economic analysis appeared to be highly cost-effective at the societal level—i.e. the health-care costs and productivity savings that accrue from reducing obesity through a specific intervention outweighed the direct investment required to deliver that intervention when assessed over the full lifetime of the target population.1198CE71, 399546Tackling obesityMany policy interventions have been suggested to address the obesity crisis across multiple studies—and indeed many such measures have been implemented, and are being implemented, now. There's recognition too that these interventions need to be part of a coherent and comprehensive whole systems strategy [4]; with some grounds for optimism that such an approach has the potential to accomplish a significant reduction in the prevalence of obesity in the UK across the next decade. [2]565CA4D9, 399547Adopt a whole systems approach to obesityTackling obesity effectively—accomplishing a population wide-shift—requires a comprehensive and integrated whole systems approach, involving a range of measures focusing on individuals, social and other systems, including at the local and community level, and on the interrelated physical, physiological, social and cognitive factors that determine health outcomes.565CA4D9, 399548Invest in employee health and wellbeingEncourage organisations to invest employee health and wellbeing; including a health risk assessment and the provision of resources to help employees address the factors that pose the greatest risk to their health and wellness. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]565CA4D9, 399552Develop a coherent fiscal, regulatory and governance frameworkTake every opportunity, iteratively over time, to bring the public fiscal, regulatory and governance framework into alignment with public health goals on obesity. Use taxes, subsidies, targets and pricing signals to incentivise change in behaviour, supply and consumption by aligning measures with the health properties of food and drink and behaviour—and seek, wherever practical, to amplify positive patterns that are aligned with the policy goals and damp those that pull against.565CA4D9, 399555Many obesity policy measures appear to be cost-effective for societyThe recent MGI study [1] reported that almost all of the obesity policy interventions included in its economic analysis appeared to be highly cost-effective at the societal level—i.e. the health-care costs and productivity savings that accrue from reducing obesity through a specific intervention outweighed the direct investment required to deliver that intervention when assessed over the full lifetime of the target population.1198CE71, 399561Deploy and integrate as many interventions as possible at scaleCommission and deploy as many interventions as possible at scale and delivered effectively, and integrated way, by the full range of sectors in society.565CA4D9, 399567Employers offer team challenge incentive schemes in the workplaceEmployers provide team challenge activities to encourage physical activity and improved key health indicators in the workplace.565CA4D9, 399568Employers give employees financial incentives to improve healthEmployers provide material incentives to individuals for improved key health indicators (e.g., discounts on insurance premiums, gym membership, prizes).565CA4D9, 399575Align the school curriculum with obesity, nutrition and activity goals565CA4D9, 399575Align the school curriculum with obesity, nutrition and activity goals565CA4D9, 399586Develop better pharmaceutical obesity therapiesObesity drug sales are forecast to $3.8bn globally in 2018 [2]—in comparison to $57bn for Diabetes drug sales[2]—with evidence suggesting that the modest average weight losses achieved with current anti-obesity agents may be of some clinical benefit [5]. However, the current generation of drugs, which act on the central nervous system to suppress appetite, have raised significant health concerns—including psychiatric disorders, such as suicidal behaviour, depression, and cardiovascular problems.565CA4D9, 399588Improve surgical interventions for obesity565CA4D9, 399592Invest in weight management servicesThe departments of health in the four nations should extend and increase the provision of weight management services across the country, to mirror the provision of smoking cessation services.565CA4D9, 399599Encourage active transport (walking and cycling)Government authorities redesign urban planning to facilitate and encourage walking and cycling.565CA4D9, 399611Understand how to align incentives and build cooperation109FDEF6, 399612Co-ordinated multi-party actions are required to tackle obesityCapturing the full potential impact is likely to require commitment from government, employers, educators, retailers, restaurants, and food and beverage manufacturers, and a combination of top-down corporate and government interventions and bottom-up community-based ones. 1198CE71, 399613No single solution creates sufficient impact to reverse obesityNo single solution creates sufficient impact to reverse obesity: only a comprehensive, systemic program of multiple interventions is likely to be effective. 1198CE71, 399614Many interventions are highly cost-effectiveAlmost all of the interventions we analyzed are highly cost-effective from the viewpoint of society.1198CE71, 399615Education and personal responsibility are necessary but not sufficientEducation and encouraging personal responsibility are necessary but not sufficient.1198CE71, 399617Experiment with multiple interventionsSociety should be prepared to experiment with possible interventions. In many intervention areas, impact data from high-quality, randomized control trials are not possible to gather. So, rather than waiting for such data, the relevant sectors of society should be pragmatic with a bias toward action, especially where the risks of intervening are low, using trial and error to flesh out their understanding of potential solutions. 565CA4D9, 399715Types of weight-management services565CA4D9, 399887Causes of obesityUnderstanding the causes of obesity is critical to the success of prevention and treatment strategies. However, while (simply put) obesity occurs when energy intake from food and drink consumption is greater than energy expenditure through the body’s metabolism and physical activity over a prolonged period (resulting in the accumulation of excess body fat), in reality many complex behavioural and societal factors contribute systemically to the current crisis and no single influence dominates.555CD992, 399932Paucity of investment in intervention measuresThe UK invests less than $1 billion a year in prevention activities such as weight-management programs and public health campaigns – i.e. around 1% of the social cost of obesity in the UK. More investment is required.555CD992, 399973A potentially unsustainable financial burden on the health systemThe range of obesity's impacts makes accurate economic analysis challenging; however, a November 2014 study from the McKinsey Global Institute placed the annual economic impact on the UK at around $73bn (£46bn). Earlier analysis and modelling for the 2007 Foresight Report suggested a cost to the NHS of around £4.2bn annually to treat people with health problems related to elevated BMI and a total wider cost to the economy of around £15.8bn (rising to £27bn by 2015 and £49.9bn by 2050).57DE7179, 400018Lost productivityObesity has as a serious impact on UK economic development –  constraining economic productivity and increasing business costs – affecting individuals’ ability to get and hold down work, their self-esteem and their underlying mental health.57DE7179, 400018Lost productivityObesity has as a serious impact on UK economic development –  constraining economic productivity and increasing business costs – affecting individuals’ ability to get and hold down work, their self-esteem and their underlying mental health.57DE7179, 400061Current incentives are mis-aligned118FF4888, 400083Government obesity efforts are too fragmented to be effectiveGovernment efforts to tackle the obesity issue seem too fragmented to be effective. In the United Kingdom, 15 central government departments; all local authorities with responsibility for health, education, and local planning; 16 EU directorates-general; and a wide range of nongovernmental organizations all have a significant impact on the major intervention areas.118FF4888, 400084Desire to priortise options becomes a barrier to actionA search for the “best” interventions or a single solution could delay action and displace responsibility. Given the seriousness of the obesity issue, the aim should be to do as much as possible as soon as possible.118FF4888

Obesity is a complex, systemic, multi-causal problem, rooted in the sedentary nature of modern post-industrial life, more widely available and more affordable food, a change in the nature and mix of diets, psychological stimuli such as stress and epigenetic triggers, and potentially even physiological disruption to the gut microbiome. There is considerable ongoing academic research into the scale and causes of the rapidly rising obesity epidemic. Researchers are digging deep into specific questions and analyzing potential solutions. However, there is a lack of integrated analysis of the holistic program that would be needed to reverse rising obesity, and what it would take to start to deliver such a program.

This discussion paper seeks to start to close this gap. We set out to learn as much as possible from existing research and build on it with our own understanding of micro- and behavioral economics, and McKinsey’s experience and research across sectors, including consumer-facing, public, and health-care sectors. Our aim then has been to step back and attempt to develop a perspective on what might be the building blocks of a societal response that could overcome rising obesity.

Citerank: (7) 348686Improve support for people with severe and complicated obesityGreater focus needs to be devoted to strategies supporting individuals who are already obese. Current government policy is focused largely on prevention, which is vital in ensuring the scale of the obesity problem and its associated costs do not increase. It does not, however, address the problems of those people already obese or morbidly obese and the costs associated with their health conditions. Moreover, obesity treatment is often cost effective.109FDEF6, 366449Deploy and integrate as many interventions as possible at scaleCommission and deploy as many interventions as possible at scale and delivered effectively, and integrated way, by the full range of sectors in society.565CA4D9, 366453Many interventions are highly cost-effectiveAlmost all of the interventions we analyzed are highly cost-effective from the viewpoint of society.1198CE71, 399561Deploy and integrate as many interventions as possible at scaleCommission and deploy as many interventions as possible at scale and delivered effectively, and integrated way, by the full range of sectors in society.565CA4D9, 399613No single solution creates sufficient impact to reverse obesityNo single solution creates sufficient impact to reverse obesity: only a comprehensive, systemic program of multiple interventions is likely to be effective. 1198CE71, 399614Many interventions are highly cost-effectiveAlmost all of the interventions we analyzed are highly cost-effective from the viewpoint of society.1198CE71, 399713Improve support for people with severe and complicated obesityGreater focus needs to be devoted to strategies supporting individuals who are already obese. Current government policy is focused largely on prevention, which is vital in ensuring the scale of the obesity problem and its associated costs do not increase. It does not, however, address the problems of those people already obese or morbidly obese and the costs associated with their health conditions. Moreover, obesity treatment is often cost effective.109FDEF6

In an attempt to contain rising trends in obesity and associated chronic diseases, many governments have implemented a range of policies to promote healthy lifestyles. These efforts have been hindered by the limited availability of evidence about the effectiveness of interventions in changing lifestyles and reducing obesity. Evaluations of the cost-effectiveness and distributional impacts of such interventions are even fewer and narrower in terms of numbers of options considered.

An economic analysis was developed jointly by the OECD and the WHO with the aim of strengthening the existing evidence-base on the efficiency of interventions to tackle unhealthy diets and sedentary lifestyles. The analysis was broadly based on the WHO-CHOICE (CHOosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective) approach, and it aimed at assessing the efficiency of a range of policy options to tackle unhealthy lifestyles and related chronic diseases. Additionally, compared to the traditional CHOICE framework, the analysis assessed the distributional impacts of preventive strategies on costs and health outcomes.

Most of the preventive interventions evaluated as part of the project have favourable cost-effectiveness ratios, relative to a scenario in which no systematic prevention is undertaken and chronic diseases are treated once they emerge. However, since the determinants of obesity are multi-factorial and affect all age groups and social strata, interventions tackling individual determinants or narrowly targeted to one groups of individuals will have a limited impact at the population level, and will not reduce significantly the scale of the obesity problem. Although the most efficient interventions are found to be outside the health sector, health care systems can have the largest impact on obesity and related chronic conditions by focusing on individuals at high risk.

Interventions targeting younger age groups are unlikely to have significant health effects at the population level for many years. The cost-effectiveness profiles of such interventions may be favourable in the long-term, but remain unfavourable for several decades at the start of the interventions. Preventive interventions do not always generate reductions in health expenditure, when the costs of treating a set of diseases that are directly affected by diet, physical activity and obesity are considered.