This is irrelevant (and not true)
The question is: should research of a thing be re-evaluated if the definition changes? Whether the definition was more accurate before or after is not relevant in this context (leaving aside the tricky philosophical question of how do you decide if a *definition* can be more or less acurrate--accurate against what?).
In fact the points raised in the piece make no mention of accuracy, one way or another.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
ISPS-US Moving Forward Map »ISPS-US Moving Forward Map
▲
Moving Forward »Moving Forward
▲
What to do about language? »What to do about language?
▲
New language »New language
▲
"Schizophrenia" »"Schizophrenia"
▲
Implication of changes in definition of "schizophrenia" »Implication of changes in definition of "schizophrenia"
▲
At first glance looks worrying but ... »At first glance looks worrying but ...
▲
This makes assumption new diagnosis more accurate. »This makes assumption new diagnosis more accurate.
■
This is irrelevant (and not true)
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About