Why have law at all?
If it is to be left up to juries to decide what is reasonable based on 'common sense' in this matter, then why not on every matter?  Why not have but one law, which reads "People may not do what they ought not be allowed to, according to common sense."?
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Parental Force and Children »Parental Force and Children
▲
Should it be legal for a parent to smack a child? »Should it be legal for a parent to smack a child?
▲
Yes, depending on the circumstances and the degree »Yes, depending on the circumstances and the degree
▲
Who decides what is appropriate? »Who decides what is appropriate?
▲
Juries should decide »Juries should decide
▲
Law should be objective »Law should be objective
▲
Law is a blunt tool »Law is a blunt tool
■
Why have law at all?
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About