Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Fast-track court proceedings
OpposingArgument
1
#31932
Delay would be minimised and parental consent retained.
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Abortion »
Abortion
Abortion☜A map exploring the issues arising in the abortion debate.☜F1CEB7
▲
Parental consent for underage pregnancy? »
Parental consent for underage pregnancy?
Parental consent for underage pregnancy?☜Assuming that abortion is legal, should parental consent be required for underage pregnant female to have abortions?☜FFB597
▲
Parental consent, not just notification, should be required »
Parental consent, not just notification, should be required
Parental consent, not just notification, should be required☜Parental consent should be required for underage pregnant women to have abortions—in all but a highly-limited range of exceptional circustances (such as when a child is estranged from parents due to sexual abuse).☜59C6EF
▲
Obtaining parental consent introduces delay »
Obtaining parental consent introduces delay
Obtaining parental consent introduces delay☜Obtaining parental consent can delay the abortion process, and increase the risk to the mothers health—as, generally, the earlier an abortion occurs the safer it is. Judicial waivers can introduce further delays—at least 22 days in the US.☜EF597B
■
Fast-track court proceedings
Fast-track court proceedings☜Delay would be minimised and parental consent retained.☜EF597B
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
Rebel Conservative
NodeID:
#31932
Node type:
OpposingArgument
Entry date (GMT):
10/5/2009 12:39:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
10/5/2009 12:39:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload