Details view: Agree

Views
Add
Edit
- Edit page
- Delete page
Share
Login
- Member login
- Register now for a free account
🔎

Agree Position1 #306168

CONTEXT(Help)

Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment? »Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?Crowdsourcing and multi-disciplinary risk assessment?☜Many risk researchers see a need to improve the theory and practice of risk management, and policy organisations want alternatives to traditional practices like consulting expert opinion and resolving issues through public policy and debate. Can a suitable methodology be found to crowdsource, i.e. harness the power of a large and diverse group of people using the power of the internet, risk assessments? What are the potential upsides; where do the pitfalls appear and can these be avoided?☜F1CEB7

▲

In Support of the Proposition »In Support of the PropositionIn Support of the Proposition☜Arguments in support of the proposition that crowdsourcing can facilitate multi-disciplinary risk assessment. ☜59C6EF

▲

The debate is transparent to all who wish to participate »The debate is transparent to all who wish to participateThe debate is transparent to all who wish to participate☜Everything is open and competing positions can be analysed and compared by anyone with relevant interest and expertise☜98CE71

■

AgreeAgree☜☜59C6EF

●

This is only true if communication works properly »This is only true if communication works properlyThis is only true if communication works properly☜Ideas must be clearly communicated, not all people are equally good communicators. However, in a crowdsourcing environment inarticulately stated arguments can be refined by the large number of participants.☜9FDEF6

●

Transparency gives greater credibility to results »Transparency gives greater credibility to resultsTransparency gives greater credibility to results☜Advantage of transparency: “Transparent decisions are also expected to...lead to more informed decision... as a “tool to permit evaluation”... transparency also promotes improved access to information as a way to build public confidence in the decision process and strengthen credibility” [Drew, C. H. & Nyerges, T. L. (2004). Transparency of environmental decision making: a case study of soil cleanup inside the Hanford 100 area. Journal of Risk Research, 7(1), 33-71]☜98CE71

Heading

Summary

Click the button to enter task scheduling information

Details

Enter task details

Message text

Select assignee(s)

Due date (click calendar)

RadDatePicker

Open the calendar popup.

Calendar

Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<	<	November 2024	>	<<

November 2024
	S	M	T	W	T	F	S
44	27	28	29	30	31	1	2
45	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
46	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
47	17	18	19	20	21	22	23
48	24	25	26	27	28	29	30
49	1	2	3	4	5	6	7

Reminder

Ready to post Copy to text

Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered

Lock

Comment graphing options

Choose comments:Comment onlyWhole threadAll comments

Choose location:To a new mapTo this map

New map options

Select map ontology Graph to private map

+Comments (0)

- CommentsAdd a commentNewest firstOldest firstShow threads

+Citations (0)

- CitationsAdd new citationList by: CiterankMap

+About

- About

Entered by:- Torran Elson
NodeID: #306168
Node type: Position
Entry date (GMT): 12/11/2013 4:52:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT): 12/11/2013 4:52:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations: 0
Outgoing cross-relations: 0
Average rating: 6 by 1 users

x Select file to upload