Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities
Position
1
#29309
A unilateral or multilateral military strike to destroy Iranian nuclear facilities and capabilities.
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
Responding to Iran's nuclear ambitions »
Responding to Iran's nuclear ambitions
Responding to Iran's nuclear ambitions☜Examining the current diplomatic crisis over Irans pursuit of full nuclear fuel cycle technology, including the ability to enrich uranium.☜F1CEB7
▲
How should the international community respond? »
How should the international community respond?
How should the international community respond?☜What policy options are available to the international community in response to Irans plans to develop full nuclear fuel cycle capability, including the ability to enrich uranium?☜FFB597
■
Military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities
Military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities☜A unilateral or multilateral military strike to destroy Iranian nuclear facilities and capabilities.☜59C6EF
●
Degree of international support for a military attack on Iran? »
Degree of international support for a military attack on Iran?
Degree of international support for a military attack on Iran?☜To what extent, if any, is there international support for a potential military attack on Iran? ☜FFB597
●
Legal bases for use of force under international law? »
Legal bases for use of force under international law?
Legal bases for use of force under international law?☜In international law, the only two bases for the use of force are self-defence and United Nations Security Council Authorization.☜FFB597
●
Delay Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons »
Delay Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons
Delay Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons☜A successful military strike would delay Irans acquisition of nuclear weapons.☜98CE71
●
Claimed benefits are dubious and prevention temporary »
Claimed benefits are dubious and prevention temporary
Claimed benefits are dubious and prevention temporary☜A military strike is only likely to delay the development of Irans nuclear capability by a few years at most.☜EF597B
●
Consequences will be severe »
Consequences will be severe
Consequences will be severe☜The consequences of a military strike are likely to be even more dangerous and unproductive both regionally and worldwide than the military action in Iraq.☜EF597B
●
If WAR is the answer, we are asking the WRONG question »
If WAR is the answer, we are asking the WRONG question
If WAR is the answer, we are asking the WRONG question☜☜EF597B
●
May strengthen the regime internally (public opinion) »
May strengthen the regime internally (public opinion)
May strengthen the regime internally (public opinion)☜The Iranian people who currently oppose the regime may unite behind the government against the West / Israel.☜EF597B
●
Military strike will encourage pursuit of nuclear weapons »
Military strike will encourage pursuit of nuclear weapons
Military strike will encourage pursuit of nuclear weapons☜A military strike is likely to strengthen the hand of those in Iran who argue that the country needs a nuclear deterrent, and result in a redoubling of effort to secure a nuclear weapons capacity.☜EF597B
●
Need for military strike reduced by the Stuxnet cyberattack »
Need for military strike reduced by the Stuxnet cyberattack
Need for military strike reduced by the Stuxnet cyberattack☜The chances of a military strike against Iran in 2011 are receding because of the success of a joint Israeli-US cyberattack on the countrys nuclear facilities, according to officials and analysts with knowledge of the clandestine operation. Possibly, sanctions are working too.☜EF597B
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
2
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
Link
[1]
Analyzing the Impact of Preventive Strikes Against Iran’s Nuclear Facilities
Author:
Anthony H. Cordesman, Abdullah Toukan - Center for Strategic & International Studies
Publication info:
September 4th, 2012
Cited by:
David Price
11:31 PM 7 September 2012 GMT
URL:
http://csis.org/files/publication/120906_Iran_US_Preventive_Strikes.pdf
Excerpt / Summary
Over the past couple of months, speculation about a U.S. or Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities has made headlines around the globe. This report addresses how the U.S. could take the lead in carrying out a preventive Military Strike against Iran If all peaceful options have been exhausted and Iran has left no other means to convince it to stop or change its course in pursuing nuclear weapons . It also examines how the US could provide a defense umbrella against any Iranian air and missile retaliation that would be aimed at U.S. military targets and allies in the region, in particular the GCC states.
Link
[2]
Weighing Benefits and Costs of Military Action Against Iran
Author:
Brent Scowcroft, William Fallon, Chuck Hagel, Anthony Zinni, Thomas Pickering et al - A bipartisan group of former U.S. diplomats, generals and government officials.
Cited by:
David Price
8:14 PM 13 September 2012 GMT
URL:
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/IranReport_091112_ExecutiveSummary.pdf?mobile=nc
Excerpt / Summary
At a time when debate on this critical issue is often driven by politics and based on unexamined assumptions about the ability of military action to achieve U.S. objectives, this paper seeks to provide a foundation for clear thinking about the potential use of force against Iran. The paper’s authors and signers, a bipartisan group of senior national security experts, recognize that this debate is part of a broader conversation about U.S. policy toward Iran. But we believe that it will be impossible to make a rational assessment of the role of military force in any overall Iran strategy, without first carefully assessing the likely benefits and costs of military action.
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#29309
Node type:
Position
Entry date (GMT):
9/25/2009 1:20:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
9/4/2011 9:44:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
1
by
2
users
x
Select file to upload