Yes, but no evidence for the resurrection
Of course, unless Mr. Andrews is willing to let the 911 hijacker’s martyrdom serve as evidence for the truth of Islam, he can’t consistently keep using the deaths of individuals who weren’t claimed eyewitnesses to the resurrection to serve as evidence for the truth of the resurrection.

I agree that Stephen was a brave martyr but we have no evidence that his death had anything to do with his belief in the resurrection. Moreover neither Stephen or Antipas were ever named as witnesses to the resurrected Jesus so, like with Paul – who I already addressed, these people cannot be used as evidence for the resurrection – which was exactly what Mr. Andrews argument was supposed to be doing. Recall that, in his opening statement, Mr. Andrews acknowledged the important distinction between ‘dying for a belief’ and dying for something you would have been in a position to know the truth about – so it’s unfortunate to see him abandoning this distinction in order to broaden the pool of people whose deaths he can appeal to for his argument.

As to Acts 12 – yes it does record the death of James, the brother of John. It claims that he was killed by Herod by the sword – no further details are given.

CONTEXT(Help)
-
Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist? »Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist?
The God of Christianity exists »The God of Christianity exists
The Resurrection of Jesus »The Resurrection of Jesus
The conversion of Paul »The conversion of Paul
No killings for specific belief in personal witness account »No killings for specific belief in personal witness account
There is a lot of evidence for martyrdoms »There is a lot of evidence for martyrdoms
Yes, but no evidence for the resurrection
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About