The Likelihood Principle works only on non-ad hoc hypotheses
The restricted version limits the applicability of the Likelihood Principle to cases in which the hypothesis being confirmed is non-ad hoc. A sufficient condition for a hypothesis being non-ad hoc (in the sense used here) is that there are independent motivations for believing the hypothesis apart from the confirming data e, or for the hypothesis to have been widely advocated prior to the confirming evidence.

This, I think, grossly misunderstands my point which was that Mr. Andrews needs to limit this kind of argument to those hypotheses that enjoy independent motivations.

Nearly every one of Mr. Andrew’s blog posts related to Fine-tuning cites the work of prominent Christian philosopher Robin Collins – so, clearly, this is someone who Mr. Andrews holds in high esteem – and rightly so. However, In his excellent and very well-known article in the Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, Collins makes this very point much clearer than I.

"Because of certain potential counterexamples, I shall use what I call the restricted version of the Likelihood Principle, although I shall often refer to it simply as the Likelihood Principle. The restricted version limits the applicability of the Likelihood Principle to cases in which the hypothesis being confirmed is non-ad hoc. A sufficient condition for a hypothesis being non-ad hoc (in the sense used here) is that there are independent motivations for believing the hypothesis apart from the confirming data e, or for the hypothesis to have been widely advocated prior to the confirming evidence."

Now, because Max’s fine-tuning argument clearly fails to restrict the likelihood principle to hypotheses that are Non ad-hoc, Robin Collins would almost certainly agree with my criticism. This is a significant technical problem for Mr. Andrews‘ particular formation of the argument as it is now susceptible to damaging counterexamples.

CONTEXT(Help)
-
Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist? »Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist?
The God of Christianity exists »The God of Christianity exists
The Fine-Tuning Argument »The Fine-Tuning Argument
(2) Life in the universe is not unlikely if there is a fine-tuner. »(2) Life in the universe is not unlikely if there is a fine-tuner.
What justification is there for this assumption? »What justification is there for this assumption?
You just don't like abductive reasoning »You just don't like abductive reasoning
The Likelihood Principle works only on non-ad hoc hypotheses
The Resurrection of Jesus »The Resurrection of Jesus
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About