Because that particle would differ from ontological perfection
I argued that the introduction of an amoral particle would still degrade the overall ontological quality of the world as there would now be a particle in the world that is something other than ontologically perfect.
 If you have a glass full of pure water, the addition of one drop of any foreign substance would degrade the overall water-purity of the water. The point is that, if God is the standard of moral and ontological perfection, any creation act, if it is not to clone himself, will degrade that overall world-purity. The world isn’t pure Godliness anymore, a maximally great being wouldn’t allow such desecration.
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist? »Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist?
The God of Christianity does not exist »The God of Christianity does not exist
A maximally great being wouldn't create the universe »A maximally great being wouldn't create the universe
(2) The Christian God would maintain GodWorld »(2) The Christian God would maintain GodWorld
God could create one single amoral particle »God could create one single amoral particle
A single particle would degrade the ontological quality of the world »A single particle would degrade the ontological quality of the world
Why? »Why?
Because that particle would differ from ontological perfection
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About