What relevance does this have to the cummulative case for a God?
What justifications does [Max] have for thinking that a particular member of a particular primate species raising from the dead isn’t unlikely given the existence of a Fine-tuner?

Because Max is presenting a cumulative case, even assuming the success of Max’s other arguments, Max’s hypothesis should should actually be, the best explanation of these 5 historical claims is that the uncaused cause who finely-tuned the constants also decided to raise Jesus from the dead.

Assuming the truth of the existence of a first-cause who created the Universe and finely tuned its constants, and absent any argument showing that there is a statistically significant correlation between an interest in tuning-based activities and the practice of necromancy among an acceptable sample size of deities, I see no reason whatever to expect that a deity fond of fine-tuning should also be fond of raising 1st century preachers from the dead. Again, I want to ask Max what justifications does he have for thinking that a particular member of a particular primate species raising from the dead isn’t unlikely given the existence of a Fine-tuner?

CONTEXT(Help)
-
Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist? »Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist?
The God of Christianity exists »The God of Christianity exists
The Resurrection of Jesus »The Resurrection of Jesus
What relevance does this have to the cummulative case for a God?
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About