This premise contradicts the contigency argument
The contrast between my contingency argument and the null-world, it seems more plausible to affirm that God desired to share the love experienced in the Trinity with created beings. There’s a harmonious consilience with an act of creation and a decree of salvation.It stands in complete opposition to the metaphysics presented in the contingency argument—Mr. Schieber, in lesser words, is saying that because there is something, there is no material and no efficient cause (God). his
CONTEXT(Help)
-
Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist? »Andrews/Schieber: Does the God of Christianity Exist?
The God of Christianity does not exist »The God of Christianity does not exist
A maximally great being wouldn't create the universe »A maximally great being wouldn't create the universe
(1) If the Christian God exists, GodWorld is the Best Possible World »(1) If the Christian God exists, GodWorld is the Best Possible World
This premise contradicts the contigency argument
The Thomistic Cosmological Argument »The Thomistic Cosmological Argument
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About